Upcoming Events

Cloud Connect
Santa Clara
Feb 13-16, 2012

Cloud Connect brings together the entire cloud eco-system to better understand the transformation we're experiencing and promises to be the defining event of the cloud computing industry. Learn about the latest cloud technologies and platforms from thought leaders in Cloud Connect’s comprehensive conference.

Register Now!

More Events »

Subscribe to Newsletter

  • Keep up with all of the latest news and analysis on the fast-moving IT industry with Network Computing newsletters.
Sign Up


Corporate.Net
workshop

Secure Electronic-Ma il: Return To Sender?


Securing Electronic-Mail Across Borders
Building a multivendor secure e-mail infrastructure requires careful planning. You need to consider the following policy issues in your strategy and product selection:

· Ownership and use of keys. Will the user or the corporation own the keys? Will a single pair be used both for signatures and encryption, or will separate pairs be maintained? Some products, such as Entrust Technologies' Entrust, Worldtalk Corp.'s Worldtalk Secure and OpenSoft Corp.'s O penSoft ExpressMail, allow for certificates containing two different pairs. Ent rust assumes corporate ownership of private encryption keys--so that data may be recovered--but personal signing keys are exclusively under the individual's control.

· Intrusiveness of encryption. Client-based e-mail security is usually implemented on a per-message basis. Does the organization trust its employees to recognize sensitive information? Can users be sufficiently trained to use encryption properly? How will long-term security awareness be maintained?

· Entrenched applications. How will an existing messaging platform be secured? Plug-ins for many MAPI and POP/IMAP mailers are available. Will emerging message access technologies--such as IMAP and browser access--be supported? Some S/MIME approaches may be incompatible with IMAP functions, and browser mail implementations let you download message parts for encryption or signature verification services.

· Integration to the corporate directory. Client products that enable public key distribution via the corporate directory a re far less cumbersome to manage than those that require peer relationships. For example, Netscape and Entrust let public LDAP-enabled directories retrieve certificates.

· Security administration roles. Does the system separate and enforce the roles of the security officer, system administrator, directory manager and user?

· Certificate authority policies. Will an internal or external CA be used? Which certificate authorities will be cross-certified? Will self-signed certificates and peer-trust relationships be allowed?

· Certificate policies. Under what verification criteria will a certificate be issued? What is the certificate's lifetime? How will Certificate Revocation Lists be used? What authentication is required before a certificate will be issued? Will certificates be distributed manually (via disk files), via e-mail or via Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) connections to a Web server?

· Client issues. How are certificates stored? What authentication mechanisms are used t o protect them? Can certificates be self-signed? Can a user establish a peer relationship with another user without formal cross-certification by a centralized authority?



Internet Rx
By Anthony Frey and Chris Lewis
IMAP Servers: Delivering a Brave, New Mailbox
By Greg Yerxa


Updated October 24, 1997

Research and Reports

Hypervisor Derby
August 2011

Network Computing: August 2011

TechWeb Careers