RSS
  Hardcore ATM Switches for the WAN The payback with network consolidation is better utilization of expensive carrier circuits, whose fees are, by far, the largest component of real-dollar outlays in the WAN. Consolidation reduces the number of expensive access lines supporting a site and uses long-haul circuits more efficiently. But look before you leap--using ATM as the consolidator can make the WAN less efficient than alternative approaches. For example, most ATM switches move voice traffic over ATM Adaptation Layer 1 (AAL1)-based Circuit Emulation Services, statically reserving mostly unused bandwidth and adding the extra overhead (approximately 12 percent) that AAL1 introduces. Thus, you'll need 1.74 Mbps just to support the traffic from a T1 (1.5 Mbps) interface, and you won't gain efficiency relative to leased lines and time-division multiplexing. A Work in Progress Fact is, proprietary ATM implementations outperform the standards. Voice su pport is the most prominent example of how vendor-specific WAN optimizations outdistance the standards. Voice equipment vendors, such as PBX manufacturers, have paid little attention to ATM, so it's up to the network to provide efficiency without changing the interfaces this equipment expects. At the time of our testing, the ATM Forum was wrapping up the specification for Voice and Telephony over ATM (VTOA), which specifies interoperable methods of efficient voice trunking, among other things. None of the switches tested has interoperable voice optimizations. Based on the current progress in the ATM Forum, it will be mid-1998 before interoperability will occur, and even then single vendor solutions will likely be more efficient. Each vendor offers a grab bag of voice tricks--the most obvious first steps being compression, silence removal, idle detection and modem/fax detecti on (fax and modem calls should remain uncompressed). All implementations inject ambient noise during silences to avoid the "drop-out " effect that complete silence on the line can create. GDC and Nortel both offer 32-Kbps ADPCM compression (ITU-T Standard G.726), and Nortel also offers 16-Kbps ADPCM. IBM offers a proprietary compression scheme that gets traffic down to about 13 Kbps (not counting ATM overhead). If you're lucky enough to have common compression algorithms between dissimilar vendor switches, you're stuck with inefficient AAL1 virtual circuits between end points. So, once again, only single-vendor solutions come close to delivering ATM's promised efficiency.
How much does this all cost and How we tested This Issues other Feature Storming the Castle By David Willis Updated October 8, 1997 
|
Best of the Web
Data deduplication: Declawing the clones
Data deduplication is emerging as a critically important new arrow in the storage administrator's quiver to answer hard questions about the increasing problem in storage growth costs.
Compression, Encryption, Deduplication, and Replication: Strange Bedfellows
One of the great ironies of storage technology is the inverse relationship between efficiency and security: Adding performance or reducing storage requirements almost always results in reducing the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of a system.
WAN Optimization Whitelists and Blacklists
Optimization is a fantastic way of saving money and creating really happy customers at the same time, but it doesn't work flawlessly for all applications.
WAN Optimization as a Managed Service: It's Not About the Cost
This insight examines how organizations outsourcing their WAN optimization initiatives to a third-party go about achieving their goals for application performance, reducing operational costs, and streamlining enterprise infrastructure.
