Upcoming Events

Cloud Connect
Santa Clara
Feb 13-16, 2012

Cloud Connect brings together the entire cloud eco-system to better understand the transformation we're experiencing and promises to be the defining event of the cloud computing industry. Learn about the latest cloud technologies and platforms from thought leaders in Cloud Connect’s comprehensive conference.

Register Now!

More Events »

Subscribe to Newsletter

  • Keep up with all of the latest news and analysis on the fast-moving IT industry with Network Computing newsletters.
Sign Up

REVIEW

Unix HSM Software Eases Data Management Woes

by Robert J. Kohlhepp

C ompress files. Move files to the server. Delete files. Get a bigger disk. Get another disk. Story of your life.

But Hierarchical Storage Management (HSM) software--a worthy mainframe era remnant--promises to help fight the Sysiphian battle against runaway data management costs.

HSM keeps recently used files on your fast, local or network server hard drive. Files used infrequently get moved to slower, cheaper media, like magneto-optical (MO) or tape. Unlike the NetWare market, which has just started to see the likes of HSM (See HSM Migrates to NetWare Platform , March issue.), Unix network managers have had HSM products for several years.

Some HSM products work only with a file server, so you can manage, for instance, an NFS-exported file system. Some are complete client/server solutions where trusted clients can migrate files to a server-attached jukebox or auto-changer. Each method targets a different audience. Server-centric systems are best where your clients work mostly with files kept on a central Network File System (NFS) server. Distributed systems are better where workgroups manage their own machines, but want a centrally managed store for migration and backup.

We evaluated SunOS versions of Alphatronix Data Migration Manager, Epoch EpochMigration Manager, OpenVision HSM Extension, Advanced Software Concepts NetArchive, QStar MastarMind and HIARC Sparcus over several months at our University of Wisconsin labs. Alt hough these products function similarly, implementations and device support vary. Most only support one migration level.

We ran these products on a Sun SparcStation 10 running SunOS 4.1.3-U1 with 64 MB of memory and a 1-GB internal hard disk. We set up a minimal file system with files of varying size and type. We used a Hewlett-Packard 20XT magneto-optical (MO) jukebox as our first-level media, and an Exabyte 10e tape auto-changer for the products that supported another migration level.

Our Analysis

OpenVision offers the best solution for a limited number of platforms and jukebox/auto-changer combinations. With its client/server model and fully segregated software components, you can purchase only the parts you need, yet be assured that any future purchases will dovetail nicely into your existing setup.

We applaud Alphatronix and HIARC for their excellent user interface and support for the native Sun file system. Using a standard file system, such as UFS, lets you mount and read a disk on any machine. This makes us feel much more secure about the availability of the migrated data.

Epoch is also a great choice, with features that rival OpenVision's, but lacks graphical configuration and administration utilities, and has very limited support for robotic devices. While Epoch supports a wide range of operating systems as clients, they are still limited to SunOS for their server.

OpenVision and Epoch also offer excellent integration with their own backup schemes, which often isn't a trivial affair. (See Integrating HSM and Backup , March issue.) Epoch and OpenVision also ease volume and data management by using the same pool of secondary media resources for HSM and backup.


Click here for price and vendor information.
Robert J. Kohlhepp can be reached at rkohlhepp@nwc.com. You can also e-mail Rob directly .

Research and Reports

Hypervisor Derby
August 2011

Network Computing: August 2011

TechWeb Careers