Upcoming Events

Executive conference

Cloud Connect March 16-18

Comprehensive thought leadership for executives, IT professionals and developers. Topics include: the ROI, cost and economics of on-demand computing; Migration strategies to move from on-premise to cloud-based IT; Vertical cloud specialization, tailoring features and architectures to specific applications, industries, and customer ecosystems

More Events »

Subscribe to Newsletter

  • Keep up with all of the latest news and analysis on the fast-moving IT industry with Network Computing newsletters.
Sign Up
Storage & Server Technology
R E V I E W  
First-Class NAS

  August 21, 2003
  By Steven Schuchart Jr.


>> continued from previous page

How We Tested

TOC Issue TOC
Printer Print full article
Printer Print this page
Printer Download as PDF
E-Mail E-Mail this URL
Discuss Discuss this article
flame author Flame the author
 
  In this article
arrow
Introduction
arrow
Dell PowerVault 775N
arrow
Excel Meridian Data NetStor MVD
arrow
Hewlett-Packard HP StorageWorks NAS B3000
arrow
First Intelligent Array POPnetserver 8000
arrow
Procom Technology NetForce 1800
arrow
Executive Summary | Web Links
arrow
How We Tested
arrow
Report Card

We tested midrange NAS devices in our Green Bay, Wis., Real-World Labs with SourceForge's Iometer 2003.5.10. We used 10 2.4-GHz Pentium 4 client machines, with network connectivity courtesy of an Extreme Networks Summit7i switch and a Cisco Catalyst 6500 with a copper Gigabit Ethernet card. Five machines were hooked to our north subnet and five to our south subnet. On each NAS, one Gigabit Ethernet NIC was connected to each segment. An 11th machine served solely as our Iometer console.

Our Iometer tests gauged CIFS (Common Internet File System) performance and NFS (Network File System) performance.

On the CIFS side, we performed the following tests: 64-Kbps linear read test; 64-Kbps linear write test; 1-MB linear read test; 1-MB linear write test; 2-MB linear read test; 2-MB linear write test; CIFS IOps and NWC CIFS Generalized Custom Test.

For all linear read and write tests, the percent read/write distribution was set to 100 percent read for the read tests and 100 percent write for the write tests. Percent random/sequential distribution was set at 100 percent sequential. Our CIFS IOps test had a 512-byte transfer request size, and was also set to 100 percent read and 100 percent sequential.

The NWC CIFS Generalized Custom Test had transfer request sizes of 512 bytes with 33 percent access distribution, 2 KB with 34 percent access distribution, and 64 Kbps with 33 percent access distribution. On the 512-byte segment, the percent read/write distribution was set at 100 percent read and the percent random/sequential distribution at 100 percent sequential. The 2-KB segment had a 67 percent read and 33 percent write distribution and the percent random/sequential was set at 100 percent random. On the 64-Kbps segment, we set the percent read/write distribution to 100 percent read and the percent random/ sequential distribution to 100 percent read.

On the NFS side, we performed these tests: 64-Kbps linear read test; 64-Kbps linear write test; 1-MB linear read test; 1-MB linear write test; 2-MB linear read test; 2-MB linear write test; NFS IOps and NWC NFS Generalized Custom Test. We performed the NFS linear read and write tests with the same parameters as those of the comparable CIFS tests (100 percent read or 100 percent write, and 100 percent sequential). However, on the NFS IOPS test, we used a 4-KB transfer request size, rather than the 512-byte size we used for the CIFS test.

Furthermore, our NWC NFS Generalized Custom Test featured transfer request sizes of 4 KB with 33 percent access distribution, 4 KB with 34 percent access distribution, and 64 KB with 33 percent access distribution. On the first 4-KB segment, we set the percent read/write distribution to 100 percent read and the percent random/ sequential distribution to 100 percent sequential. On the second 4-KB segment, we set the percent read/write distribution to 67 percent read-33 percent write, and the percent random/sequential to 100 percent random. On the 64-KB segment, the percent read/write distribution was 100 percent read and the percent random/sequential distribution was 100 percent read.


start top   Executive Summary | Web Links Report Card 

Best of the Web

Data deduplication: Declawing the clones

Data deduplication is emerging as a critically important new arrow in the storage administrator's quiver to answer hard questions about the increasing problem in storage growth costs.

Quick Read

Compression, Encryption, Deduplication, and Replication: Strange Bedfellows

One of the great ironies of storage technology is the inverse relationship between efficiency and security: Adding performance or reducing storage requirements almost always results in reducing the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of a system.

Quick Read

WAN Optimization Whitelists and Blacklists

Optimization is a fantastic way of saving money and creating really happy customers at the same time, but it doesn't work flawlessly for all applications.

Quick Read

WAN Optimization as a Managed Service: It's Not About the Cost

This insight examines how organizations outsourcing their WAN optimization initiatives to a third-party go about achieving their goals for application performance, reducing operational costs, and streamlining enterprise infrastructure.

Quick Read

  Sponsored Links

Premium Content

Data Centers Gone Wild
February 22, 2010

NWC


Salary

Video