Upcoming Events

Executive conference

Cloud Connect March 16-18

Comprehensive thought leadership for executives, IT professionals and developers. Topics include: the ROI, cost and economics of on-demand computing; Migration strategies to move from on-premise to cloud-based IT; Vertical cloud specialization, tailoring features and architectures to specific applications, industries, and customer ecosystems

More Events »

Subscribe to Newsletter

  • Keep up with all of the latest news and analysis on the fast-moving IT industry with Network Computing newsletters.
Sign Up
Security
R E V I E W  
Policy Enforcers

  May 29, 2003
  By Mike Fratto


>> continued from previous page

BindView Development Corp. bv-Control 7.2 and Policy Operations Center 4.2
TOC Issue TOC
Printer Print full article
Printer Print this page
Printer Download as PDF
E-Mail E-Mail this URL
Discuss Discuss this article
flame author Flame the author
 
  In this article
arrow
Introduction
arrow
BindView Development Corp. bv-Control 7.2 and Policy Operations Center 4.2
arrow
Configuresoft Enterprise Configuration Manager 4.0 with Security Update Manager 2.0
arrow
Pedestal Software SecurityExpressions 3.0
arrow
Symantec Enterprise Security Manager 5.5
arrow
PoliVec Security Policy Automation Suite (Builder 2.6, Scanner 3.5, Enforcer 1.1)
arrow
NetIQ VigilEnt Security Manager 4.0
arrow
Computer Associates eTrust Policy Compliance 7.4
arrow
How We Tested
arrow
Report Card

Remember the model airplanes you built in your youth? There were a lot of parts to put together with glue that made you dizzy, but the final result was worth it. Installing bv-Control brought back those memories. Luckily, we had to install it only once.

The product has an interesting access-control model where administrators are added using their local or domain accounts. Once in bv-Control, users are granted access rights to specific portions of the application. By default, administrators in bv-Control don't have the right to make configuration changes on managed computers using ActiveAdmin. That right has to be granted specifically. The upshot: You decide who has read and write access to target computers.

For bv-Control to interact with monitored computers, a credential database is created that stores user accounts and passwords for the target domain or computer. We created a domain administrator, called "bindview," in all our Windows domains, then added that account to the bv-Control Credential database. For our Unix computers, we added a local "bindview" account to each computer (we don't run NIS or NIS+) with root group privileges.

Finally we added snap-ins for our target applications, such as Windows desktops and servers, Unix computers, and Active Directory. Each managed application or OS required a specific snap-in, and during the installation phase, the credential database was specified and a query engine assigned. The query engine carried gathered data and could be installed anywhere, provided the management station could contact it. For example, a query engine might be installed in a remote office to limit the amount of bandwidth used across the WAN. Windows computers are agentless, but the Unix ones aren't--and the Unix agent installation was painless.


We were pleased that bv-Control supports a wide variety of OSs; we tested with Windows 2000 Pro and Server, Red Hat Linux 7.3 and Solaris 8--the latter two required agents. Within a few minutes of a successful install we were happily generating reports using the many predefined formats and figuring out ad hoc queries. The reports were readable, though not as informative as those generated by Symantec's Enterprise Security Manager or Configuresoft's Security Update Manager.

Reports could be run against all the computers in the domain at this point, but sometimes we wanted to run reports against a subset. "Scopes" define a subset of targets and act as a grouping mechanism. Computers can be added manually to a scope--an easy process--but we preferred Configuresoft's approach of defining a scope according to properties, so computers are automatically added per group.

Generating basic reports was painless using one of the canned formats: We set the scope and ran the report; bv-Control remotely queried the target computers and gathered the data. Targets that were unreachable showed up as errors. We liked that we could export reports to a variety of formats and data sources. And we customized several reports with the scope and report format and saved to a personal or shared folder.

Building custom reports and ad hoc queries was straightforward. For example, we wanted to see which files and directories allowed the "everyone" group full control. We created an assessment and selected the information we wanted in the report, like domain/workgroup name, machine name, directory name and where permissions matched "full control for everyone." Then we created a filter so that we would see only true matches. We could search for anything in the file descriptor.

Although bv-Control doesn't have an internal scheduler, any scheduler, including Microsoft's, can be used to run reports. We created a task list (a list of reports to be run) that included reports that discovered user accounts that were due to expire in 15 days, had not logged in for 30 days, or had been locked out. We defined the credential database that would be used and the scope of the reports, and we defined the report format. Then, in Microsoft's Scheduler, we created the task, which called a bv-Control command-line program, and passed the task list as an argument.

Policy Operations Center is a hosted service that let us create a written security policy and distribute it to our end users. Several templates are available, or we could import our own policy. End users log into the site, read the policy, and acknowledge that they read it. Unfortunately, when we went to the selected URL in the guise of an end user, we were prompted to supply only a first and last name and an e-mail address. No authentication is required, and to make matters worse, there isn't a way to compare a list of users who should read the policy against a list of users who did read the policy. BindView told us that this feature will be available in a future release. In our opinion, for thirty-five grand, user authentication and tracking should be standard.

Coming in on the low side of the middle tier, cost-wise, bv-Control has a lot of features for a good price. If we add in the $35,000 for a one-year subscription to Policy Operations Center, the total jumps to the high end of the middle-tier pricing--$171,858 for the first year.

bv-Control 7.2 and Policy Operations Center 4.2, BindView Corp., (800) 813-5869. www.bindview.com


start top  Introduction Configuresoft Enterprise Configuration Manager 4.0 with Security Update Manager 2.0  

Best of the Web

Data deduplication: Declawing the clones

Data deduplication is emerging as a critically important new arrow in the storage administrator's quiver to answer hard questions about the increasing problem in storage growth costs.

Quick Read

Compression, Encryption, Deduplication, and Replication: Strange Bedfellows

One of the great ironies of storage technology is the inverse relationship between efficiency and security: Adding performance or reducing storage requirements almost always results in reducing the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of a system.

Quick Read

WAN Optimization Whitelists and Blacklists

Optimization is a fantastic way of saving money and creating really happy customers at the same time, but it doesn't work flawlessly for all applications.

Quick Read

WAN Optimization as a Managed Service: It's Not About the Cost

This insight examines how organizations outsourcing their WAN optimization initiatives to a third-party go about achieving their goals for application performance, reducing operational costs, and streamlining enterprise infrastructure.

Quick Read

  Sponsored Links

Premium Content

Data Centers Gone Wild
February 22, 2010

NWC


Salary

Video