Upcoming Events

Executive conference

Cloud Connect March 16-18

Comprehensive thought leadership for executives, IT professionals and developers. Topics include: the ROI, cost and economics of on-demand computing; Migration strategies to move from on-premise to cloud-based IT; Vertical cloud specialization, tailoring features and architectures to specific applications, industries, and customer ecosystems

More Events »

Subscribe to Newsletter

  • Keep up with all of the latest news and analysis on the fast-moving IT industry with Network Computing newsletters.
Sign Up
Network + Systems Infrastructure
F E A T U R E  
Shoot for the Moon

  March 17, 2003
  By Peter Morrissey


TOC Issue TOC
Printer Print full article
Printer Print this page
Printer Download as PDF
E-Mail E-Mail this URL
Discuss Discuss this article
flame author Flame the author
 
  In this article
arrow
Introduction
arrow
CYA Strategy
arrow
Gorilla vs. Guerrilla
arrow
Executive Summary
arrow
Can Infrastructure ROI Be Calculated? Maybe
arrow
Epoll Results

It doesn't take an astrologer to know the planets are in alignment now for those building new networks or doing major end-to-end upgrades. But given the financial outlay involved and the myriad options and standards in play, you may be seeing stars. Should you go for 10 Gigabit at the core? VoIP? Maybe, but that means QoS (Quality of Service) concerns. How about Power over Ethernet? The possibilities appear endless.

To help you narrow down the choices, we sent out an RFI for an end-to-end network infrastructure for our fictional company, CradletoGrave (see "Premium Network, Four Ways"). We also polled readers on the networking technologies you're using and your purchasing approaches.

Our RFI specified a single-vendor network, but the results of our reader survey make it clear that not all of you would take this route. In fact, the poll showed you are evenly divided, with 48 percent buying into the best-of-breed approach versus 52 percent favoring single vendors, which we defined as one vendor providing 90 percent or more of your Layer 2 and Layer 3 routing and switching equipment. We threw in the 90 percent qualification to ensure


that we didn't skew the results by putting readers who occasionally stray to fill a specific need in the best-of-breed camp.

Among the advantages we see to the single-vendor approach are:

• It's easier, logistically, to deal with one provider, and this can impact TCO.

• It eliminates finger-pointing. When there are problems in a multivendor environment, one vendor tends to blame another. Sure, a skilled network-engineering staff can cut through the bull, but there are more productive goals toward which they should be devoting their energies.

• It alleviates support and training woes. Supporting multiple platforms means added training costs, and dealing with multiple vendors' support organizations can make life more difficult.

• It can save you money. Spending more money with a single vendor may mean big discounts.

• It streamlines network management. Unfortunately, standards aren't even in sight to make management possible across multiple vendors. If you use GUI-based network management to configure equipment, updating software and setting up QoS, you're going to have to run multiple providers' management products.

Still, even those who swear by the single-vendor approach should not be too rigid--there are many good reasons to roam, including:

• Gaining the flexibility to find the exact feature set and best price that fit your needs at any given time. Many vendors provide high-quality point solutions that are superior enough to justify adding other providers to your mix.

• Getting the technology you need, when you need it. Sometimes your preferred source simply can't get a needed technology out the door quickly enough.

• Keeping yourself current on what's available. It's good business to evaluate other companies' equipment periodically so you are positioned to make a switch if you become dissatisfied with your current vendor. Your knowledge of other companies' products may help keep your vendors on their toes, too.

Although our fictional company sought one vendor for its end-to-end infrastructure, it's keeping its options open for future adds, such as VoIP (voice over IP). Simplifying your network configuration whenever possible and sticking to standards will minimize the disadvantages of dealing with multiple vendors.


start top Introduction CYA Strategy 

Best of the Web

Data deduplication: Declawing the clones

Data deduplication is emerging as a critically important new arrow in the storage administrator's quiver to answer hard questions about the increasing problem in storage growth costs.

Quick Read

Compression, Encryption, Deduplication, and Replication: Strange Bedfellows

One of the great ironies of storage technology is the inverse relationship between efficiency and security: Adding performance or reducing storage requirements almost always results in reducing the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of a system.

Quick Read

WAN Optimization Whitelists and Blacklists

Optimization is a fantastic way of saving money and creating really happy customers at the same time, but it doesn't work flawlessly for all applications.

Quick Read

WAN Optimization as a Managed Service: It's Not About the Cost

This insight examines how organizations outsourcing their WAN optimization initiatives to a third-party go about achieving their goals for application performance, reducing operational costs, and streamlining enterprise infrastructure.

Quick Read

  Sponsored Links

Premium Content

Next Generation Data Center, Delivered, November 17th
NWC


Salary

Video