Upcoming Events

Executive conference

Cloud Connect March 16-18

Comprehensive thought leadership for executives, IT professionals and developers. Topics include: the ROI, cost and economics of on-demand computing; Migration strategies to move from on-premise to cloud-based IT; Vertical cloud specialization, tailoring features and architectures to specific applications, industries, and customer ecosystems

More Events »

Subscribe to Newsletter

  • Keep up with all of the latest news and analysis on the fast-moving IT industry with Network Computing newsletters.
Sign Up
Network + Systems Management
R E V I E W  
The End All of Network Performance Management

  December 1, 2002
  By Bruce Boardman


>> continued from previous page

Concord Communications eHealth Suite 5.0.2
TOC Issue TOC
Printer Print full article
Printer Print this page
Printer Download as PDF
E-Mail E-Mail this URL
flame author Flame the author
 
  In this article
arrow
Introduction
arrow
ProactiveNet 4.1.2
arrow
Concord Communications eHealth Suite 5.0.2
arrow
Other Products Reviwed
arrow
Executive Summary
arrow
How We Tested
arrow
Report Card

Long the gold standard, eHealth Suite is still one of the best performance management solutions on the market. The number of data sources from which eHealth Suite can draw is huge: network devices, servers, applications, transactions, probes and circuits. The biggest difference between eHealth Suite and ProactiveNet is not the price--though eHealth Suite is more expensive in our pricing scenario--but the extensive implementation and administration eHealth Suite entails. For example, eHealth's root-cause tools require thresholds be set manually, based on the user's data transmissions. Also, we had to apply our network-topology knowledge to determine what devices in the network path could be causing a network slowdown.

Concord pioneered assessing network-performance specifics, and eHealth's reporting is unmatched. The product's Health Reports show more than a happy or sad face for each monitored element. Each report includes various health indices that combine characteristics for each device type. A router health index, for example, includes buffer misses, buffer utilization, CPU and faults. The LAN interface index includes errors, discards and collisions. The higher an index's value, the closer it is to a threshold.


Like ProactiveNet, eHealth Suite requires that you learn how changing thresholds will affect events and reports. eHealth Suite clearly documents what the various thresholds are measuring. All eHealth's thresholds come preset and do not change based on normal usage, as ProactiveNet's intelligent thresholds did.

Concord, along with Compuware, has welded together various products to create very wide selections from which data can be gathered. The company has been at this game so long, it has probably encountered everything you need to have monitored. As such, eHealth Suite gathers data from probes, switches, routers, remote-access devices, frame relay circuits and many more devices. eHealth Suite is better integrated than Compuware's Vantage Suite, so it's easier to deploy server-side and client-side agents. The suite's AdvantagEdge server-monitoring module is a separate product, but the Web-based interface is integrated into eHealth's reporting portal.

The AdvantagEdge module includes the server-side SystemEdge agents, which gather performance metrics via SNMP and rely on both host MIBs and Concord's own extensions. SystemEdge actively checks for services on both local and remote servers and alerts a central server, but even with the Host MIB responding to an SNMP walk, the eHealth Suite server didn't recognize some of our servers under test. Concord had not seen this problem before.

We used the SystemEdge agents to monitor HTTP, POP3, SMTP and other network services. Like ProactiveNet, the agent's performance metrics include name resolution, connection time and total transaction time; the agents also monitored SNMP OIDs (object identifiers), processes, CPU and memory. Crossing a threshold set off an alarm.

eHealth Suite also leverages the Cisco Service Assurance Agent and Cisco NetFlow monitor, which uses Cisco routers to run remote checks for latency and availability. It may not be wise to add processes to a busy router, but if one's hanging around the edge of your network, you can use it get some easy, accurate performance information on network services.

eHealth Suite remains a very solid performer and a good enterprise choice for tracking end-to-end network application performance.

eHealth Suite 5.0.2, starts at $15,000 (typical licenses range from $100,000 to $150,000, depending on infrastructure size), Concord Communications, (888) 832-4340, (508) 460-4646. www.concord.com


start top  ProactiveNet 4.1.2 Other Products Reviwed 

Best of the Web

Data deduplication: Declawing the clones

Data deduplication is emerging as a critically important new arrow in the storage administrator's quiver to answer hard questions about the increasing problem in storage growth costs.

Quick Read

Compression, Encryption, Deduplication, and Replication: Strange Bedfellows

One of the great ironies of storage technology is the inverse relationship between efficiency and security: Adding performance or reducing storage requirements almost always results in reducing the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of a system.

Quick Read

WAN Optimization Whitelists and Blacklists

Optimization is a fantastic way of saving money and creating really happy customers at the same time, but it doesn't work flawlessly for all applications.

Quick Read

WAN Optimization as a Managed Service: It's Not About the Cost

This insight examines how organizations outsourcing their WAN optimization initiatives to a third-party go about achieving their goals for application performance, reducing operational costs, and streamlining enterprise infrastructure.

Quick Read

  Sponsored Links

Premium Content

Data Centers Gone Wild
February 22, 2010

NWC


Salary

Video