Upcoming Events

Executive conference

Cloud Connect March 16-18

Comprehensive thought leadership for executives, IT professionals and developers. Topics include: the ROI, cost and economics of on-demand computing; Migration strategies to move from on-premise to cloud-based IT; Vertical cloud specialization, tailoring features and architectures to specific applications, industries, and customer ecosystems

More Events »

Subscribe to Newsletter

  • Keep up with all of the latest news and analysis on the fast-moving IT industry with Network Computing newsletters.
Sign Up
Network + Systems Management
R E V I E W  
The End All of Network Performance Management

  December 1, 2002
  By Bruce Boardman


TOC Issue TOC
Printer Print full article
Printer Print this page
Printer Download as PDF
E-Mail E-Mail this URL
flame author Flame the author
 
  In this article
arrow
Introduction
arrow
ProactiveNet 4.1.2
arrow
Concord Communications eHealth Suite 5.0.2
arrow
Other Products Reviwed
arrow
Executive Summary
arrow
How We Tested
arrow
Report Card

The perfect Network performance management product bridges the gap between business and IT, linking business-transaction accountability to IT performance priorities. Businesses need to service and track customers; IT must anticipate and react to that need. To rise to the challenge, you need accurate and digestible representations about network, server and applications performance--and a way to manage the performance data.

Unfortunately, no MIB can give you a thumbs up or thumbs down on overall performance. Rather, performance data comes from many sources--SNMP MIB II, Host MIBs, Enterprise MIBs, proprietary agents, robotic transactions, probes and client-side agents.

We tested six end-to-end performance management products--designed to evaluate overall network, server and application performance--in our Syracuse University Real-World Labs®. Each product adds to the collected data by calculating utilization and averages over time, and by creating events and constructs to link the collected data to a high-level view that represents what's going on and whether it supports business goals. Thresholds, baselines and filters provide the context for the collected data, which is presented in predefined or custom reports.


The distinction between these performance products and fault- or exception-based network management products (aka managers of managers, reviewed in "Hot MoMs,") is blurring. Fault-based products combine performance data with the events and alerts that make up their fault data. They gather that data from many sources, whereas performance products gather events by polling a device, recognizing that the device is over threshold and then collecting the threshold violation event. Most performance products won't collect events or alarms from external sources.

Furthermore, fault products generally don't offer the perspective provided by high-level health views on application-, systems- and network-performance products, mainly because of limited performance data analysis. Performance products filter, abstract and condense underlying performance statistics, creating a synapse between business and IT. This is the point at which the collected performance data becomes useful information. The best products go beyond putting a number on overall health; they attempt to determine the root cause of a problem.

Monitoring the Managers

We tested Argent Software's The Argent Guardian 6.0a, Compuware Corp.'s Vantage 8, Concord Communications' eHealth Suite 5.0.2, NetScout Systems' nGenius Performance Manager 1.4, NetQoS' SuperAgent 3.0 and ProactiveNet 4.1.2 from ProactiveNet. We rated these packages' reporting, root-cause analysis, data collection, implementation, administration, pricing and "gotchas."

All the products include good canned reports, flexible report writers and browser-delivered formats. But each product partitions reports and delegates control over content and format differently. One key capability that separated the winners from the losers in our tests was root-cause analysis. Our Editor's Choice, ProactiveNet, used this functionality to get to the heart of our IT problems.

As for implementation and administration, none of the products will instantly tell you what's going on with your network. We had to spend a lot of time determining what to collect and how to group data.

To get pricing, we gave each vendor a Visio diagram of a network, complete with details about consoles, servers, routers, switches and interfaces, and asked for an estimate.

Finally, though no software is bug-free, we couldn't ignore even occasional screw-ups. Simply put, we dinged the products that dinged us.

ProactiveNet is a solid performer, is easy to set up and administer and has the best root-cause analysis features. Concord's eHealth Suite is a close second, with superior report delivery. NetScout also has a fantastic report interface but did not provide any of its agent technology for our tests. Instead, NetScout relied on its very strong probe data collection. However, this product has the steepest price--35 percent higher than the next highest competitor. Compuware's Vantage 8.0 has the widest data collection and analysis, but its many modules are loosely integrated, increasing administrative effort and error. The Argent Guardian focuses on systems management, but includes SNMP monitoring of network devices at no additional cost. Unfortunately, the SNMP reports require hefty setup work to be useful. NetQoS's SuperAgent appliance is easy to implement. It did well in our tests but did not give us as deep a look at the client side of transactions, and it supports only TCP.


start top Introduction ProactiveNet 4.1.2 

Best of the Web

Data deduplication: Declawing the clones

Data deduplication is emerging as a critically important new arrow in the storage administrator's quiver to answer hard questions about the increasing problem in storage growth costs.

Quick Read

Compression, Encryption, Deduplication, and Replication: Strange Bedfellows

One of the great ironies of storage technology is the inverse relationship between efficiency and security: Adding performance or reducing storage requirements almost always results in reducing the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of a system.

Quick Read

WAN Optimization Whitelists and Blacklists

Optimization is a fantastic way of saving money and creating really happy customers at the same time, but it doesn't work flawlessly for all applications.

Quick Read

WAN Optimization as a Managed Service: It's Not About the Cost

This insight examines how organizations outsourcing their WAN optimization initiatives to a third-party go about achieving their goals for application performance, reducing operational costs, and streamlining enterprise infrastructure.

Quick Read

  Sponsored Links

Premium Content

Next Generation Data Center, Delivered, November 17th
NWC


Salary

Video