|
|
|
|
Cheap and Available
|
 |
|
November 15, 2002
By Dave Molta
|
>> continued from previous page
Assessing the Risks
Given that ROI models for fixed wireless almost always look good, why isn't the market exploding? It's all about risk management. IT professionals understand the security and reliability attributes of traditional network technologies, but wireless opens up a new set of concerns. Stop worrying--for the most part, the risk is manageable.
In many respects, fixed wireless is the victim of the well-documented security and reliability problems that gave those sexier mobile wireless systems their bad reputations. For example, security problems commonly associated with WLANs have not only garnered lots of attention, they've created a whole industry with companies focused on that specific need. However, the security issues surrounding WLANs, which are intended to propagate signals throughout a building or campus, are not applicable to fixed wireless, where directional antennas mounted high on buildings focus a narrow radio signal between two locations. Even if a snoop could somehow intercept these signals, all the major vendors support sophisticated encryption systems. And because the number of connections is small and centrally managed, key management is not the issue it is with WLANs. In short, don't let security concerns dissuade you from implementing a point-to-point fixed wireless system.
|
|
Reliability, on the other hand, is a legitimate concern, though it, too, is usually manageable. Because radio-based fixed-wireless systems operate at relatively low frequencies, you won't experience the weather-related problems with them that are typical of home-satellite systems, which work at much higher frequencies. You can further mitigate risk by turning to a professional installer, who can conduct a thorough path analysis prior to installation. By using directional antennas and building in an appropriate fade margin, professionals can guarantee 99.99 percent reliability in most areas.
Interference is the other side of the reliability coin, and this is a concern, particularly for devices operating in the 2.4-GHz band. WLAN systems, cordless phones and myriad other low-cost radio devices can affect a fixed-wireless system. Again, these problems can often be managed by using alternate radio channels or through antenna polarization, but there's always the risk of DoS (denial of service) attacks being mounted using inexpensive, easy-to-conceal radios and antennas. In fairness, motivated criminals can mount DoS attacks on most information systems, so in that sense, wireless isn't unique. Nonetheless, an increasing number of organizations are choosing to implement their fixed-wireless systems in the 5-GHz bands, where more channels are available and the risk of interference is lower.
Some of the reliability risk of point-to-point systems is associated with these systems' dependence on LoS (line of sight) communications. If LoS is broken, the link will go down. Syracuse University, one of our Real-World Labs® partners, recently experienced just such an outage when a crane being used to construct a new parking garage was parked directly between two buildings connected via wireless. Those situations can be dicey to manage, so as with any mission-critical system, put contingency plans in place before you dive in.
Future Prospects
wireless technology is evolving rapidly, and technical breakthroughs that enhance performance and reliability are likely. Much of the innovation that is occurring in the WLAN space is bleeding over into both multipoint and point-to-point fixed wireless. For example, use of new 5-GHz WLAN chipsets will likely spawn a clutch of low-cost, high-performance fixed wireless systems. Significant progress is also being made to deliver more sophisticated mesh topologies that improve overall system reliability. In addition, the requirements that LoS be available between antennas is likely to be relaxed with the release of near-LoS and, eventually, non-LoS systems. These developments are particularly important for the evolution of multipoint fixed wireless but will likely expand the possibilities for point-to-point systems as well.
Dave Molta is a Network Computing senior technology editor. He is also an assistant professor in the School of Information Studies and director of the Center for Emerging Network Technologies at Syracuse University in New York. Write to him at dmolta@nwc.com.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSS
