But, in fact, there are a few tangible numbers that can be used to calculate ROI, such as the savings associated with avoiding churn, or the loss of an existing customer. Retention is less costly than acquiring new customers, so it behooves an organization to determine why customers are leaving and what can be done to prevent the loss, saving hard dollars on a regular basis. A BI solution can find the characteristics shared by customers that leave, and help you put a plan into place to either avoid those customers during acquisition or provide those customers with an incentive to stay.
Because you can characterize the customers who have left, you can also determine how many additional customers share those characteristics, and therefore, which might leave (see graphic "Avoiding Churn"). For every month that the customers in that "churn set" do not leave, the cost of acquiring a new customer (paperwork, sales, time to set up accounts and so on) can be applied to the ROI of your BI tools, assuming that the tools were used to identify the set in the first place.
Another potential candidate for an ROI calculation is increased revenue from a marketing campaign targeted at a specific set of customers identified. Any revenue received from that campaign can be tied to the BI solution.
Unfortunately, both of these hypothetical examples have problems. Perhaps the customer would have stayed anyway or purchased without the marketing campaign. For this reason, some experts suggest running a controlled set of experiments to determine whether business intelligence tools will effect a sufficient ROI. Fortunately, many vendors are prepared for such an audition: They bill customers on a per-user basis, so the customers can start small to determine if the product is helping the bottom line. By targeting a simple campaign at customers identified by the tools as "likely to purchase X" based on past purchasing history, the revenue can be more tightly tied back to the BI solution. It's critical to ensure that customers receive no additional marketing influences during the campaign's run. Even in this case, however, the cause and effect can't be completely associated.
You may have noticed that the ROI calculations we describe are based on having a BI solution in place. That's for a very good reason: It's nearly impossible to project the ROI of a BI solution before it has been used, which makes using ROI as a justification method almost as valid as "it ships in a pretty box."
However, there is another acceptable prepurchase method of determining whether to consider a BI solution. Calculate ROI as a measure of efficiency in information distribution. This is also the easiest of all ROI justifications to compute. Consider the example in the graphic "Automated Reporting".