Fingerprint Scanners: Hands On
If you plan to pursue a biometric authentication solution, consider the benefits and limitations of the biometric device you choose. Fingerprint scanners are our biometric device of choice because of their decreasing cost, increasing popularity and continued integration into the desktop environment. Also, users will most readily identify with the fingerprint scanner and use it on the desktop. There are other biometric technologies--voice recognition, retinal scanners, camera-based facial recognition systems and signature recognition, to name a few. But we think fingerprint scanners are a proven favorite in biometric authentication, offering the best solution for a variety of needs.
The fingerprint scanner works by taking a mathematical snapshot of a user's unique biological traits, communicated through the loops and swirls of the fingerprint. These characteristics are identified as minutiae and are converted via proprietary algorithms into a string of data that can be transferred, encrypted (if necessary) and stored in a user database. The string represents a unique identifier that only one user can possess. Each device vendor has a different technology to handle this process, and the functionality and ease of use for your device is based on this and how the software vendor integrates the device for enrollment and authentication.
There are several key issues to consider when choosing a fingerprint scanner. Up front, it is important to stress that many of the vendors of the products we tested on the user-management end support specific devices from a few select vendors. Start by determining what devices are supported by the management system and the options that are best for your environment and needs. Cost is always an important consideration as you determine the number of biometric authentication devices you'll need. Remember that each system we tested will let passwords be used, and others (Indenticator Technology's BioLogon, for one) provide support for specific smart-card solutions.
Each device we worked with required an open port on our test machines. The majority of devices plugged into our parallel port. ABC's BioMouse allowed a pass-through to our parallel port, but models from Keytronics and Veridicom took the whole port for the device. Each device we tested requires a power input to operate. Some drew phantom power from the keyboard port, while others required a separate AC line. As you might expect, each product adds another cable or set of cables to the desktop and occupies a footprint about the size of a mouse. If space and cables are a concern, Cherry, Keytronics and other vendors offer an integrated keyboard-scanner solution.
REPORTS
Analyize In-Line NAC strategies and products.
ANALYTICS Plan and design your enterprise blade server deployments
InformationWeek U.S. IT Salary Survey 2008
Salaries for business technology professionals are falling. Here's what you need to know in order to make good hiring decisions and personal career choices. Download Today