![]() |
||||||||||||||||
Buyer's Guide: Biometrically Speaking August 23, 1999 By Frederick M. Avolio
But what about biometric authentication for the rest of us? Will biometrics work in real business applications?
Biometric Basics All biometric technologies work in roughly the same way. First, a user registers with the system, facilitating the capture of initial biometric characteristic samples (usually more than one). This lets the system build a meaningful set of biometric attributes into a template for later matching. For fingerprint scans, multiple scans of a finger are taken (often more than one finger is multiply scanned--solving the problem of logging in if you've cut or injured one of your fingers). While gleaning attributes from these scans, the biometric software builds templates (one for each of the scanned fingers), which are then stored in a database and identified with the user. The biometric system is later used for identification or verification. Often leveraged by law enforcement, the identification is labor-intensive, requiring that the system compare a new sample with all possible candidates. Usually, for computer and network applications, the application employs biometrics in conjunction with other information (for example, a user name). In this case, the software looks up the template related to the user name, compares the new sample against it and determines if it has a match. Of course, biometrics are not 100 percent accurate. Device-use errors and injuries can render false readings, which are broken down into two measured categories: False Rejection Rate (FRR) and False Acceptance Rate (FAR). The FRR is the rate at which authorized users may be erroneously rejected, and FAR is the measurement of how often impostors might be mistakenly granted access. Which is more important? It depends on your security policy, which should reflect your business-needs analysis and risk analysis. Owners of ATMs (automated teller machines), for example, would rather incur a false acceptance than risk rejecting a real customer's entry. Given banks' emphasis on customer satisfaction, it's understandable that they would rather lose a few hundred dollars than hazard losing a customer. On the other hand, many secure government facilities would rather err on the side of a low FAR, preferring the system to erroneously reject a legitimate user. Authenticating the user would then involve human intervention--an ID check by a guard or some action by a system manager--but to these institutions the security is worth the occasional inconvenience.
Benefits and Problems The ICSA 1999 Biometrics Survey (www.icsa. net/) notes that for all the potential of biometric-based security, it still hasn't caught on with most industries. One reason is that biometric devices have been expensive, though lately prices have come down--some start as low as $100 per seat. Also, biometric systems usually require additional equipment on the PC. And integrating biometric user verification with existing applications has been difficult. This, however, is not because of a lack of standards.
| ||||||||||||||||
|
PAGE: 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I NEXT PAGE |
||||||||||||||||


our customizable newsletter, sends you security alerts, product updates and software patches on the products you use. Sign up now at 









