![]() |
|
| F E A T U R E | |
|
|
|
July 12, 1999 |
||||||||||||
|
|
Executive Summary Network-Attached Storage Consolidating storage pools on a heterogeneous network was once an arduous task that ate up considerable time, resources and money. The need for better consolidation and cross-platform file sharing has spawned NAS (Network-Attached Storage) servers.
When you consider the time and money spent maintaining all the file servers required to provide highly available storage versus the initial cost of a NAS server, the benefits are apparent. Because NAS servers are dedicated appliances, they can be optimized to give maximum performance with available hardware. This gives them a clear advantage over conventional file servers. In our Real-World Labs® we evaluated four NAS servers. We tested a pair of enterprise-class servers--Network Appliance's F760 Enterprise and LSI Storage Systems' LSI Logic MetaStor SH850--and two servers suitable for workgroups--Meridian Data's Snap! and Cobalt Networks' NASRaQ.
Our testing showed that NAS products have come a long way fast. Each of the entries made a solid showing and each has strengths that make it a good choice for many sites.
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
PAGE: 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I FIRST PAGE |
||||||||||||












